I spent a chunk of time on Thursday dealing with a variety of piles of things around the house ... I would be inclined to call the stuff junk, although I was pleased that little of the stuff is going out of our home as garbage. Much of the rest is going out of the house, but in orderly piles to be recycled. So, the cans, glass, plastics, cardboard, newsprint, beverage containers (one of the few things that organized recycling in St. John's entails) are sorted, and we'll soon have a pile of clothing to donate to a charity. It's earnest, I guess ... and not the easiest thing to do.
Coincidentally, Andres, my wife's Manhattan-based cousin, pointed me on Thursday about a fellow New Yorker who's putting the recycling bit to shame. No Impact Man is a blog that documents he and his family's effort to go a year with no negative effect on the environment. As the author, Colin Beavan, wrote in an op-ed in the New York Times this week:
This means we’ll get as close as we can to creating no trash (so no takeout), emitting no carbon dioxide (so no driving or flying) and pouring no toxins in the water (so no laundry detergent), as well as mitigating impacts we can’t avoid (so planting trees). Not to mention: no elevators, subways, buying products in packaging, plastics, air-conditioning, TV or toilet paper.
Jeepers. There are some things I'll do - I save kitchen scraps year-round for composting, which in the winter months means, because indoor worms are not an option if I want to keep my marriage intact, stocking dozens of containers outside my back door till the snow melts a bit more - but that's a tall order. (Although I'm pretty sure I could go a year without subways, and maybe even elevators.) Interesting premise for a blog; no wonder there's a book deal and possible movie already in the wings.
Recent Comments